Skip to content
DigitalUs Media

Backlinks, toxic links and disavows

Link Building and Negative SEO

How sites earn links that count, how to spot toxic or spam backlinks, and when a disavow file actually helps. Includes our own negative SEO case study.

Link building and negative SEO: where to start

Link building is how a website earns links from other sites, and this section also covers the other side of it: recognizing spam links, judging negative SEO and deciding whether a disavow file is needed. It’s for business owners and marketing managers who want links that count, and who want to know what to do when their backlink profile fills up with junk.

Our own site runs through these guides as the example. In September 2026, digitalusmedia.com went from 498 to 1,321 referring domains in about a month, almost all of it spam, and its Google impressions fell from 1,393 to 24 in the same month. We can’t prove the links caused the drop, and the guides say so.

Where to start

Read them in this order, from what a good link is to what to do about bad ones:

  1. Authority backlinks explains what makes a link worth having, why DR and DA are not Google metrics, and why relevance comes before authority.
  2. Our negative SEO attack case study is the full record of the spam wave on our own site, with the anchor patterns, the Search Console numbers and what we did.

The decisions that come up most often

Judging links by a third-party score. Domain Rating, Domain Authority and similar scores come from SEO tools, not from Google. Our own site shows how little a count says: its referring domains grew from 18 in June 2024 to more than 1,200 by October 2026, while its Ahrefs Domain Rating fell from 4.1 to 0.5, because almost all of the growth was spam. Ask instead whether a real reader would click the link and whether the site is about your topic.

Paying for shortcuts. Google’s spam policies list buying or selling links for ranking purposes, excessive link exchanges, large-scale guest posting with keyword-rich anchors and automated link programs as link spam. Since the December 2022 link spam update, Google says SpamBrain can detect both sites buying links and sites used to pass them, and neutralize those links. A bought link is likely to be worth nothing even if it never leads to a manual action.

Disavowing too early or too broadly. Google’s disavow documentation says most sites will not need the tool, and that it can harm performance if used incorrectly. Rule out other causes of a traffic drop first: the Manual Actions and Security Issues reports, the Page indexing report and Google’s Search Status Dashboard for updates rolling out at the time. When a disavow file is justified, work at the domain level, and leave any domain you hesitate over in a “review” list rather than in the file.

Upload details that trip people up. The disavow tool doesn’t support Domain properties, so the file goes to a URL-prefix property, and each upload replaces the previous list completely.

Not watching at all. A monthly look at new referring domains, or an alert in your backlink tool, would have shown our own spike within days instead of weeks.

In our view, a few relevant links that other sites chose to give will do more for a small site than any amount of cleanup, which only removes risk.

Our link building and link cleanup service covers both sides: audits and disavow files when the data justifies them, and earning links without link schemes.

Frequently asked questions

What is link building?

Link building is the work of getting other websites to link to yours. Under Google's spam policies, the links worth having are the ones a site chooses to give because your page helps its readers; buying, exchanging or automating links for ranking purposes is link spam.

Do backlinks still matter for SEO?

Yes, but as one signal among many. Google uses links to discover pages and understand which ones are useful, and it neutralizes unnatural links with its SpamBrain system, so only earned, relevant links help.

Can spam links from other sites hurt my rankings?

Google says it works hard to make sure actions on third-party sites don't harm a website, and that in most cases it can tell which links to trust. Our own small site lost 98% of its Google impressions in the month a spam link wave arrived; we can't prove the links caused it, so we treat spam waves as a real risk for sites with little authority.

When should I use Google's disavow tool?

Google says to disavow only when you have a considerable number of spammy or artificial links and they have caused, or likely will cause, a manual action. Most sites never need the tool, and using it on good links can hurt performance.

Are 'toxic backlink' scores from SEO tools reliable?

They're estimates, and Google doesn't use them. Treat them as a first filter, then decide by looking at the anchor texts, domain names, traffic and the dates the links appeared.